U.S. Federal Court hits President Barack Hussein Obama with three charges of abuse of office

My take on what is going on in this Federal Court that is charging President Obama with abuse of office.

Is this all they are charging him with?   I mean really out of everything that he has done to abuse his power, and this is ALL they are charging him with?   Why so late in the game?  Why not last year before the election?   Why only such a narrow scope of charges?

Nixon was impeached for far less. Nixon was impeached for secretly spying on a few people. Obama has openly admitted spying on a few hundred million. Plus what I think is egregious is how he has started illegal wars of aggression (without congressional approval), such as in Libya. He has used drones to kill over 100 children in Pakistan. He has supplied renegade rebels in foreign countries with munitions (and covered up the Benghazi scandal so people wouldn’t know the truth of what was going on there) . Last but certainly not least, he has increased the national debt more than ALL other presidents COMBINED. Literally.
This welfare president has robbed the American people and their children of their way of life for centuries.

I found this on DailyPaul.com

http://www.dailypaul.com/275003/us-federal-court-hits-president-barack-hussein-obama-with-three-charges-of-abuse-of-office

Link to article at Before ITs News:

http://beforeitsnews.com/blogging-citizen-journalism/2013/02…

<<<” U.S. Federal Court hits President Barack Hussein Obama with three charges of abuse of office. The charges presented are detailed and damning. The indictments assert that President Obama “acted as a dictator” to exceed his powers of office to appoint officials behind the back of Congress during a recess period.”>>>

<<<“In a staggering announcement an Associated Press report declared: “President Barack Obama violated the Constitution when he bypassed the Senate last year to appoint three members of the National Labor Relations Board, a federal appeals court ruled Friday.”

Mr. Lyndon Larouche, a well-connected journalist and political activist characterized the court’s assessment as “probably the greatest indictment ever seen on a standing president throughout history.” White House press secretary Jay Carney reacted strongly against the charges declaring, “we believe that the president’s recess appointments are constitutionally sound.” However, the federal court seems to disagree having put in place ” a list of charges presented as conclusions” according to Larouche. The court appears to take the view that no such recess was in place. As such, the president was in violation of Section 5 of Article 1 of the Constitution that stipulates that a president cannot make appointments without the consent of the Senate.

The failed Obama gambit had hoped to apply the section of the Constitution that reads: “The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.”

The Washington Post reports on the seriousness of this abuse of office, “is more than an unconstitutional attempt to circumvent the Senate’s advise-and-consent role. It is a breathtaking violation of the separation of powers and the duty of comity that the executive owes to Congress.”

Crucially, no other president in history has ever tried to force through such alleged “ recess appointments” while Congress is still in session. The offenses occurred last year when President Obama opted to bypass Congress and unilaterally appoint three people to seats on the National Labor Relations Board . He also made Richard Cordray (pictured with Obama) head of the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (after the Senate blocked action on his nomination). Cordray’s appointment, made on the same date, has been challenged in a separate court case.

Lyndon Larouche has characterized the events as probably the worst violation by any sitting president trying to use a “procedural loophole.” Jubilant Republicans are already looking to set in motion impeachment proceedings. Larouche, who studied the court indictments, believes Obama’s offenses are “far graver” than those that led to the impeachment and removal from office of disgraced Republican president, Richard Nixon, after the Watergate scandal.”>>>

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/16248-u-s-drones-kill-more-than-30-in-yemen-school-targeted-in-one-attack

In other news about Obama, please encourage the Senate to DEFUND OBAMACARE!

Don’t Fund Obamacare – dontfundobamacare.com?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *